Nhoie Gee's Twitter Updates
Nhoie Gee 2010 Chat
Wednesday, January 5, 2011
Tuesday, October 26, 2010
Somewhere Down The Road (Tagalog Short Story)
Saturday, October 16, 2010
Miss Lesotho World 2010 Karabelo Mokoallo Interview (By: Nhoie Gee)
Tuesday, September 7, 2010
'I'm sure Mendoza shot tourists' - driver (abs-cbnnews.com)
'I'm sure Mendoza shot tourists' - driver
http://www.abs-cbnnews.com/nation/09/07/10/im-sure-mendoza-shot-tourists-driver
MANILA, Philippines - Apparently disoriented, the bus driver on that fateful day on August 23 thought he saw each and every passenger shot dead by the gunman.
At that point in time, all he could think of was to survive. With all his might, he took a couple of minutes to poke and ruin the handcuffs that kept him still for almost 12 hours of the entire siege.
Describing in detail the events of that day to the Incident Investigation and Review Committee, driver Alberto Lubang said he could not anymore remember if the passengers even cried for their lives.
All he remembered was the deafening shot from dismissed police officer Rolando Mendoza’s gun.
“Sigurado po ako na siya, binaril niya mga pasahero. Isa-isang putok. Yung mahaba (M-16 rifle)…Wala ako naririnig (cries). Basta, isa-isa, nilapitan niya,” he said.
(I’m sure, he shot the passengers. One after the other, using the rifle…I could not remember the cries anymore.)
He even pleaded for his life, telling Mendoza: “Pakawalan niyo ako. Maawa na kayo sa akin.” (Release me now. Take pity on me)
Mendoza only told him: “Bahala ka na diyan.” (It’s your life, that’s your choice.)
After a few minutes, the public saw on live television how he escaped, jumping out of the window of the bus, running towards blazing lights and telling everyone, “Patay na silang lahat, patay na silang lahat.” (They’re all dead.)
Hitch-hiker
Lubang remembered Mendoza ascend the bus at around 9:45 a.m. at the Fort Bonifacio area asking for a ride, despite a warning that the company does not allow hitch-hikers.
Mendoza, however, insisted, telling everyone later that “Sorry, hostage na kayo.” (You’re now my hostages.)
Lubang did not believe at first, until Mendoza told him to proceed to the Quirino Grandstand in Luneta.
There, he and the tourist guide Diana Chang, was allowed to call their employees and to tell them they were already in a hostage situation.
The review committee several times asked him the same set of questions, noting the discrepancy between his statement and that with the police earlier interviewed in an executive session.
Police supposedly claimed they received news of the hostage incident at around 9:07 a.m., ready to respond to the hostage crisis.
Justice Secretary Leila de Lima, however, noted “everybody realizes that this is crucial…Sino ang tama, sino ang mali? They said (police) they received the information at around 9:07 a.m. If it’s true 9:45 pa kayo umalis dun [at the same time that he and Chang were able to inform their employers], malaki ang deperensya. What is this?”
Lubang tries to remember
Admitting he was just estimating the time, Lubang, however, remained unperturbed and recounted the series of events on that day.
He said he only noticed the police in the area at around 11:00 a.m.
By that time, Mendoza had already allowed a hostage to get off the bus after claiming she was suffering from loose bowel movement. He also allowed Chang, the tourist guide, to accompany the passenger out.
Lubang, observing the passengers from his rear view mirror, said “nakaupo lang sila, hindi gumagalaw, hindi umiiyak.” (They were all still, no one was moving, no one was crying.)
He said Mendoza was calm during the early hours of the bus siege, telling even the passengers “makipag-cooperate lang kayo at hindi ko kayo sasaktan.” (You all cooperate with me and I will not hurt you.)
He even told them about the case that triggered his actions, Lubang recounted.
Mendoza notices brother
Mendoza was even calm during the early hours of the ordeal, insisting that he only wanted out of the criminal case lodged before the Office of the Ombudsman, Lubang said.
At around 3:00 p.m., Mendoza noticed from inside of the bus how Police Chief Inspector Romeo Salvador disarmed his brother, Gregorio.
“Sabi niya sa akin, ‘kapatid ko iyon, tawagin mo 2 negosyador (including Superintendent Orlando Yebra). Sinigawan ko po, lumapit naman, kasama yung kapatid,” he said.
(He told me, ‘that’s my brother. Call the 2 negotiators.’ The others went near us.)
By that time, Mendoza had already informed the negotiator to return his brother’s gun.
Lubang said the gunman was pacified somewhat when Yebra passed on to him a call from Manila Vice Mayor Isko Moreno, informing him that his case is already being studied by the Ombudsman.
“Puro ‘yes, sir’ ‘opo, sir’ lang ang naririnig ko,” Lubang said. (He only said ‘yes, sir.’)
No invectives, bribe
Mendoza was presumably talking to Deputy Ombudsman Emilio Gonzalez III on the phone.
Different from the statements of resource persons who have already appeared before the review committee, Lubang said, however, he never heard Mendoza hurl invectives against the other person on the other end of the line.
He also did not hear Mendoza say “humihingi ka pa P150,000,” as what the other negotiators supposedly heard.
Gonzalez has already denied he was involved in any bribery case.
What Lubang only caught was Mendoza telling Gonzalez “kung may mamamatay, kasalanan mo ito.” (If somebody dies, it will be your fault)
‘Turn the television on’
At 5:00 p.m., Mendoza asked Lubang to turn on the television.
At around that same time, the gunman received the brown envelope containing the Ombudsman’s letter.
Lubang could not remember if the media called Mendoza or the other way around. He could only remember that the gunman passed on to him a cell phone so he could open the brown envelope.
Mendoza told him: “Kausapin mo muna yan, si Mike Enriquez yan.” (Talk to him, that’s Mike Enriquez)
Lubang answered the phone. The broadcaster on the other line supposedly told him: “Mr. Driver, kumusta po kayo diyan.” (Mr. Driver, how are you all there?)
The caller also introduced himself as “Mike Enriquez”.
Asked if it was indeed Enriquez on the other end, Lubang said he could not be sure since the voice was “matining, maliit” (small voice). Enriquez, a GMA-7 anchor, has a loud and booming voice.
Based on earlier testimonies, it was RMN’s Mike Rogas who had interviewed Mendoza during the crucial moments of the hostage crisis.
It was then that Mendoza talked to the reporter, informing him that the letter was “mere garbage.”
Brother's pleas
Lubang also remembered Gregorio trigger further the ire of his brother by saying: “Tol, yung baril ko, hindi pa binabalik.” (Brother, they have not returned my gun)
Asked what could have incited Mendoza to open fire, Lubang said “nung pagkatapos po mabasa ang sulat, nagalit na siya.” (He got mad after reading the letter.)
He said Mendoza also noticed on live television that police had started to reign in his brother.
“Naririnig ko na lang siya, paulit-ulit, ‘Pakawalan niyo yan, Kung hindi, uubusin ko itong mga ito,’” he said. (I heard him say several times, ‘Release him, or I’ll call all of them here.’)
In only a matter of minutes, the shooting spree began.
Driver breaks handcuffs
Upon hearing the shots, Lubang said he used a nail file to break the handcuff used on him.
Despite the fear he was next to be shot, Lubang said he risked everything to break free.
Upon escaping, he was later brought to the command post for his debriefing.
Asked if he gave consistent statements to the police, he said: “Nakita ko po sila e kung papano binaril. Nung matapos, ang naisip ko, tapos na. Ang nasa isip ko, patay na sila lahat.”
(I saw how they were shot. When I could not hear anything anymore, I assumed they were all dead.)
Pressed by Teresita Ang See to describe further the incidents, Lubang said he does not remember if police had asked him of details about the bus, how it could be opened or used for the police’s tactics team.
He also said high-ranking officials were not already at the command post at that time.
616 vs. 666: Which Is the Real Number of the Beast?
A recent Greek fragment discovery has brought an old issue back into focus. You may have seen in the news recently that a fragment of the "oldest NT manuscript" was found to say in Revelation 13:18 that the number of the beast was 616 instead of 666.
http://www.escapeallthesethings.com/666-616-number-mark-of-the-beast.htm
Report: 616, Not 666 The Real Number of the Beast
First, here's an excerpt of the report of the discovery:
A newly discovered fragment of the oldest surviving copy of the New Testament indicates that, as far as the Antichrist goes, theologians, scholars, heavy metal groups, and television evangelists have got the wrong number. Instead of 666, it's actually the far less ominous 616.The new fragment from the Book of Revelation, written in ancient Greek and dating from the late third century, is part of a hoard of previously unintelligible manuscripts discovered in historic dumps outside Oxyrhynchus in Egypt. Now a team of expert classicists, using new photographic techniques, are finally deciphering the original writing.
Professor David Parker, Professor of New Testament Textual Criticism and Paleography at the University of Birmingham, thinks that 616, although less memorable than 666, is the original. He said: "This is an example of gematria, where numbers are based on the numerical values of letters in people's names. Early Christians would use numbers to hide the identity of people who they were attacking: 616 refers to the Emperor Caligula."
The Book of Revelation is traditionally considered to be written by John, a disciple of Jesus; it identifies 666 as the mark of the Antichrist. In America, the fundamentalist Christian right often use the number in sermons about the coming Apocalypse.
They and satanists responded coolly to the new "Revelation". Peter Gilmore, High Priest of the Church of Satan, based in New York, said: "By using 666 we're using something that the Christians fear. Mind you, if they do switch to 616 being the number of the beast then we'll start using that."
Don't Write 616 over 666 In Your Bible Just Yet!
So, if you did not know better, you might already be heading to your Bible with a red marker to cross out the 666 and write in 616. After all, we have an textual critic of the New Testament telling us 666 is wrong. But not so fast!
I have a few reasons to keep this one on the shelf, and even to doubt it. Note that none of these are proofs that 616 is wrong. They are just my thinking on why I believe 666 is correct still at this point.
Reasons To Still Prefer 666 over 616
1. The article cites just one man's conclusion. But I'm the type of person who likes to check things out for himself, rather than trust someone else to do my thinking. I want to see the data and reasoning he used to conclude 616 is correct, even though it's in the minority of manuscripts. For example, when I decided that Y'hovah was probably the correct transliteration for God's name in the Old Testament, I did not do so because Nehemia Gordon said so. I did so after looking through the Old Testament manuscripts myself, looking at the vowel points and carefully reasoning out what they likely were telling us were the original vowels. Until I see the proof myself for 616, I'm not likely to switch from 666 based on one man's opinion.
2. One thing that would settle this question would be if a man appeared on the scene fulfilling everything else for the "First Beast from the Sea" in Revelation 13 and other prophecies related to what is (erroneously) called "the Antichrist". If we "calculated" the "number of his name" as instructed and it came to either 616 or 666 we would have our answer. There is such a man. Prince Charles of Wales' heraldic achievement (coat-of-arms) literally consists of the very beasts described in Rev 13 and Dan 7, he is a Prince (Dan 9:27) and he is from the old Roman Empire that destroyed the Temple (Dan 9:27). So what does his name add up to? Rather than 616, his name adds up to 666 using the ancient gematria system. And not only does this work in the English, but also in the official Hebrew transliteration (Nasich Charles Mem Wales). What are the odds anyone would have a name that calculates to the same number in two languages (without tampering with the transliteration like is done to Javier Solana's name to make it equal 666 in Hebrew)?
3. The Book of Revelation introduces very little that is new and tends to mostly expand on concepts or symbols that have already been used elsewhere in the Bible. You must use the rest of the Bible to decipher much of Revelation. It is noteworthy therefore that 616 appears nowhere else in the Bible while 666 appears four times. It very interestingly appears in this verse related to another exalted and adored king, one whom no doubt the coming Antichrist will want to emulate in many ways.
1 Kings 10:14 -- The weight of the gold that Solomon received yearly was666 talents,
If anyone gets a good textual criticism report on 616 vs 666 please let me know as I'd like to get to see why someone would conclude 616 is the original.
4. Irenaeus in the second century, a century before the manuscript Parker relies on, already knew of the 616 variation and discounted it as an error:
Such, then, being the state of the case, and this number being found in all the most approved and ancient copies [of the Apocalypse], and those men who saw John face to face bearing their testimony [to it]; while reason also leads us to conclude that the number of the name of the beast, [if reckoned] according to the Greek mode of calculation by the [value of] the letters contained in it, will amount to six hundred and sixty and six; that is, the number of tens shall be equal to that of the hundreds, and the number of hundreds equal to that of the units (for that number which [expresses] the digit six being adhered to throughout, indicates the recapitulations of that apostasy, taken in its full extent, which occurred at the beginning, during the intermediate periods, and which shall take place at the end), - I do not know how it is that some have erred following the ordinary mode of speech, and have vitiated the middle number in the name, deducting the amount of fifty from it, so that instead of six decads they will have it that there is but one. [I am inclined to think that this occurred through the fault of the copyists, as is wont to happen, since numbers also are expressed by letters; so that the Greek letter which expresses the number sixty was easily expanded into the letter Iota of the Greeks.] - Adv. haer. 5.30
In this rather obscurely expressed passage, Irenaeus was proposing (even in the second century - a century BEFORE this oldest surviving copy!) that old, Greek copies of Revelation contained an error of copying in which the Greek letter xi with gematraic value 60 was wrongly copied into the Greek letter iota with number value 10.
Meanwhile, I hope this helps you keep this one on the shelf as well.
Sunday, September 5, 2010
Indonesia's smoking toddler kicks habit
http://www.abs-cbnnews.com/lifestyle/classified-odd/09/05/10/indonesias-smoking-toddler-kicks-habit?utm_source=twitterfeed&utm_medium=twitter
JAKARTA – A two-year-old Indonesian boy who smoked about 40 cigarettes a day has kicked the habit after receiving intensive specialist care, a child welfare official said Thursday.
Ardi Rizal shocked the world when a video of him drawing heavily on cigarettes appeared on the Internet in May and drew attention to Indonesia's failure to regulate the tobacco industry.
"He has quit smoking and the most important thing is he doesn't ask for cigarettes anymore," national commission for child protection secretary-general Arist Merdeka Sirait told AFP.
Six months after his father gave him his first cigarette, the overweight boy was smoking two packs a day and threw violent tantrums if his addiction was not satisfied.
Accompanied by his mother, the boy left his village on Sumatra island in July to undergo treatment in the capital.
"He received psychosocial therapy for one month, during which therapists kept him busy with activities and encouraged him to play with kids of the same age," Sirait said.
"We diverted his addiction from cigarettes to playing."
Ardi's case has highlighted the tobacco industry's aggressive marketing to women and children in developing countries like Indonesia, where regulations are weak and many people do not know that smoking is dangerous.
Sirait said the government had given financial support to Ardi's parents, who were ignorant of smoking's dangers and used cigarettes to keep the toddler happy as they worked long hours at a street market.
"Ardi was very happy when he left Jakarta this morning as he has really missed his father in the village," Sirait said.
Cigarette consumption in the Southeast Asian archipelago of some 240 million people soared 47% in the 1990s, according to the World Health Organization.